×
Legal Advice    Lawyers Click Here

Compassionate Appointment cannot be claimed as a vested right for Appointment- Supreme Court

Tinku Vs State of Haryana

2024-Nov-14

Tinku Vs State of Haryana

Hon'bLe Supreme Court observed that "Such right for appointment is not a condition of service of an employee who dies in harness, which must be given to dependent without any kind of scrutiny of process"    

"The purpose, therefore, of such policies is to give immediate succour to the family. When seen in this conspectus, three years as has been laid down from the date of death of the employee for putting forth a claim by a dependant, which, includes attainment of majority as per the 1999 policy instructions issued by the Government of Haryana cannot be said to be in any case unjustified or illogical, especially when compassionate appointment is not a vested right."

 

Tinku Vs State of Haryana

What can the Legal Experts do for you? Our team of lawyers is ready to help you in minutes with any legal question.

Legal AdviceWhatsapp Legal AdviceCALL NOW :- 8800110989 Legal AdviceToll Free :- 1800-212-9001
Latest News And Judgment
Public Query