2023-Jul-03
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 8624/2023 & CM APPL. 32735/2023, CM APPL. 32736/2023
DR SOHAIL MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv.
with Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Nishant Bahuguna
and Ms. Usha Sharma, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC with Mr.
Vinay Yadav and Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
30.06.2023
per C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. If a woman employee in one department of the Government of India is sexually harassed by an employee of another department, would she, or would she not, be entitled to invoke the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (―the SHW Act‖, hereinafter)? The petitioner would seek to submit that the answer has necessarily to be in the negative. In other words, according to the petitioner, one has to be sexually harassed by a colleague in one’s own department, for the SHW Act to apply.
2. This writ petition, directed against judgment dated 23 June 2023 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (―the learned Tribunal‖) in OA 1838/2023, requires the Court to address this issue, which, the petitioner submits, is thus far res integra.
What can the Legal Experts do for you? Our team of lawyers is ready to help you in minutes with any legal question.