2023-Feb-24
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
Case No. : WP(C)/7927/2022
BIPLAB KARMAKAR
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS .
REP BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
2:THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC) REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN
3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION GUWAHATI ASSAM HOUSE FED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN-781006
4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE
5:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
6:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE (RECRUITMENT )
7:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE
8:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
O R D E R
09.12.2022
Heard Mr. HR Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. SS Roy, learned CGC for the respondents.
2. The petitioner herein participated in a selection process for the posts of Constable (GD) in the CAPFs pursuant to an employment notice dated 21.07.2018. The petitioner otherwise belong to the OBC category. Being candidates belonging to OBC category, the petitioner is entitled to a relaxation in the required height and size of chest. By availing such relaxation as regards height and chest, the petitioner entered the selection process as OBC category candidate. According to the petitioners although he has availed the relaxation in height and size of chest, being OBC category candidate, in the selection process as per merit, the petitioner was above the merit of the last selected general category candidate and as such claimed that he should be selected and appointed as general category candidate.
3. The aforesaid situation had arisen in a circumstance, which is an admitted position of the parties that the last selected candidate in the OBC merit wise was in a higher position than the last selected candidate in the general category and in the circumstance, the petitioner as OBC category candidate was not eligible in the category of OBC, but his merit performance made them to be placed at a position higher than the last selected general category candidate.
4. Mr. SS Roy, learned CGC for the respondents have produced the result of the writ petitioner involved in the writ petition. As per the result produced, the writ petitioner had secured more marks in order of merit than the last selected general category candidate.
5. As per the law of reservation, if a reserved category candidate secures more marks in order of merit than the last selected general category candidate, his candidature is to be considered as a general category candidate for the merit purpose.
6. Accordingly, as the petitioner had secured more marks than the4 selected general category candidate, we are of the view that the petitioner is entitled to be selected and appointed as Constable (GD) as general category candidate.
7. In view of such declaration, we direct the respondents to pass a reasoned order by taking note of the conclusion arrived hereinabove and accordingly issue appropriate appointment orders. 8. The writ petition allowed, as indicated above. A copy of the comparative marks given is kept on record.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
What can the Legal Experts do for you? Our team of lawyers is ready to help you in minutes with any legal question.